History and Historical European Martial Arts in the Codex Martialis


Postby Galloglaich » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:14 pm

So today, I got this book in the mail, finally

http://www.amazon.com/Europe-1400-1458- ... 557&sr=1-1

Already it has divulged many miracles and wonders, for those of you who appreciate Vikings, pagan religion and so on, check this out, this was written by Aneas Silvius Piccolomini, diplomat, pornographer and adventurer, and later in life Pope Pious II, in 1458 AD (translated by Robert Brown) from his entry on Lithuania. Keep in mind, Lithuania had only technically converted to Christianity in 1380 and it was a very incomplete process at this time. Piccolomini is recounting an account told to him in Poland by Jerome of Prague, a missionary who had been evicted from Lithuania by Duke Vytautus). Make of this story what you will.

"Going further inland, he found another tribe which worshiped the sun, and venerated, with remarkable devotion, an iron hammer of extraordinary size. When the priests were asked about the meaning of this cult, they replied that once upon a time the sun disappeared for several months because a mighty king had captured it and confined it in the dungeon of a strongly fortified tower. A giant had then come to the help of the sun and smashed the tower with a huge hammer, releasing the sun and restoring it to humanity. The tool with which mortals had recovered light was therefore worthy of veneration. Jerome laughed at their simplicity and showed it to be an empty fable. He explained that the sun and the moon and the stars are actually creations of almighty God, with which he adorned the heavens, bidding them shine with everlasting light to the benefit of mankind."

More goodness from Piccolomini, 1458 AD. He seems to accuse the Swiss of barbarity here, but also (far worse among Europeans) poor table manners:

"The Swiss are a fierce mountain people. When the people of Zurrich reneged on a pact that they had formed with them, they mustered an army and marched into their territory, destroying everything in their path. When the people of Zurich ventured to meet them in battle, they were massacred. Such was the brutality and savagery of the Swiss toward their defeated foes that they held a feast on the very spot where they had won the victory. They piled up the bodies of the slain to make tables and chairs, and, slitting open the corpses of the enemy, they drank their blood and toor out their hearts with their teeth."

This was a reference to the battle of St. Jakob an der Sihl. That's, incidentally, the mayor of Zurich on the bridge there fighting a holding action so the majority of his troops can retreat back behind the town walls. They don't make mayors like they used to.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of ... n_der_Sihl

(I suspect the last sentence may have been slightly hyperbolic)

On the other hand, Piccolomini seems to have a high opinion of the Swiss for courage, notably at the battle of St. Jakob and der Bris, where 1,200 Swiss commoners fought all day against 20,000 French cavalry:

"...Louis, the Dauphin of Vienne, led almost the whole French army into the territory of Basel and struck great fear into the people of that city. The Swiss, in accordance with a treaty of alliance, sent four thousand soldiers drawn from the pick of their young men to reinforce the city. When the dauphin observed them approaching, he positioned himself with his whole army midway between Basel and the Swiss. The Swiss did not shrink from battle, though they had to fight on foot and could see a line of thirty thousand horsemen stood facing them. Both sides fought with all their strength. Finally, the Swiss, les vanquished than exhausted by victory, paid the penalty for taking on too audacious a task. Except for a handful who escaped by flight, they all lay slaughtered on the field of battle. Nevertheless, few of the Swiss died unavenged. Many who had been pierced with lances slipped through the rain of spears to kill an enemy and exact retributio0n for their wounds."

This speaks to the issue of fighting after a mortal wound, which many of us have discussed lately.
Last edited by Galloglaich on Sun Dec 15, 2013 8:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 2010
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 5:30 pm

Re: Piccolomini

Postby Galloglaich » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:14 pm

Picolomini (1458) in his passage on Franconia diverts into a passage about Duke Albrecht III "Achilles" and seems to describe a type of mounted duel I hadn't heard of, anyone heard of something like this in the records?

"On seventeen occasions, protected only by a shield and helmet with the rest of his body uncovered (as in a type of duel practiced by the Germans), he charged with pointed lance in hand against challengers armed the same way, without ever suffering an injury or failing to unhorse his opponents."

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... rennen.jpg

Posts: 2010
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 5:30 pm

Re: Piccolomini

Postby Galloglaich » Sun Dec 15, 2013 9:14 pm

Piccolomoni on the Frisians:

[the notes in blue are by me]

"This race is fierce and proficient in arms, powerful and tall in physique, confident and fearless in spirit - and it prides itself on it's independence. Although Philip, the ruler of Burgundy, calls himself master of the land, in reality Frisia is free and follows its own customs, neither enduring subjection to foreigners nor aspiring to dominate them; in defense of freedom the Frisian willingly embraces death. These people dislike men of military rank and do not tolerate the ambitious man who exalts himself above others. They select annual magistrrates to administer the state with impartial justice. They punish the lasciviuousness of women very severely and are reluctant to accept unmarried priests, for fear they might pollute the beds of others; for they think it scarcely possible and contrary to nature for a man to restrain his desires. Their assets lie entirely in cattle, their land is flat and marshy and very rich in grass. It lacks wood, so they feed their fires with bituminous sod [he probably means peat] and dry cow-dung."

I think this is a reference to the 'peasant republic' of the Dithmarschen which was half Frisian and half Saxon

Piccolomini on the Swedes and the remarkable queen Margaret of Scandinavia

"But when Magnus departed this life in Sweden, Duke Albert of Mecklenburg received the crown at the invitation of the people. Albert felt contempt for the government of his female neighbor and began to provoke war with Denmark and Norway. Margaret mustered her troops and came to meet him, and on a wide open plain they fought a battle which made it seem as if she had donned the spirit of a man and her enemy that of a woman. Defeated, taken prisoner, and led in a triumphal procession, Albert lost his kingdom. When he was finally released, he lived out his old age in disgrace in his fathers home. A women of great fame, Margaret ruled three kingdoms and governed her subjects with majesty and devotion until her old age." [Margaret formed the Kalmar union, which worked well enough under her reign but after her death became the cause of many wars in Scandinavia]

[The preceding paragraph is about Queen Margaret I of Norway / Denmark / Sweden https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_I_of_Denmark]

"Ultimately when she was enfeebled by age and unable to manage so great an empire by herself, she adopted as her son the fourteen-year-old Duke Erik of Pomerania, entrusted her kingdom to him, and married him to Philippa, daughter of the king of England. After his wife died with producing an heir, he refused to marry again and ruled for fifty-dive years until he was finally deposed by a popular uprising in the reign of Emperor Fredereick. Duke Christopher of Bavaria, his nephew on his sister's side, was appointed in his place and allowed his uncle to rule the isle of Gotland during the ten years of his own reign. When Christopher passed away, Christian received the crown of Denmark and Norway.

The Swedes, however, disagreed over the choice of a king, some wishing to entrust the kingdom to Karl
[this would be Karl Kuntsson Bonde], a distinguished knight, others to Knut, his younger brother Knut [this person seems to be unknown to history]. While the matter of the election was still pending [electing kings was still common in Northern and Central Europe at this time], Karl sent soldiers in and secretly occupied the town of Stockholm, where the king's residence is maintained. Knut assaulted the fortress with the help of his supporters, and thus began a war between the brothers over the kingship. For a long time, the struggle was indecisive. At last, after many had been killed on both sides, and armistice was arranged on the condition that the power of choosing a king should fall on the common people and that the nobility be excluded [this may be a reference to the Riksdag, the parliament of the four estates of Sweden which was established in 1435 but included Burghers and Peasants for the first time around when Piccolomini wrote his book]. Since Karl enjoyed greater popularity, sovereignty was placed in his hands.

Knut pursued the life of a private individual. Karl, on the other hand, was puffed up and arrogant over his new power and sent an armed fleet to expel the aging Erik from Gotland, where he was harming nobody and keeping to himself. [This is definitely not the case, Erik had given up his kingship of Denmark and reverted to a life of piracy and was in charge of a substantial pirate fleet out of Wisby]. he died in 1459 a year after Piccolomini published this book] He is still alive today and is said to be living in his homeland of Pomerania, content with little. By his example, he teaches how precarious and vain are the affairs of mortals, for, having been stripped of three powerful kingdoms, he was not even able, despite his advanced years, to retain until his death the small island on which he had lived in seclusion for ten years. [practicing piracy].

But neither did the crimes of Karl go unpunished. in the midst of persecuting Christian churches, flouting religion, robbing priests, prohibiting the observance of feast days, and generally disrupting the laws of God and man, he was defeated in a great battle by Jon Bengstsson, the bishop of Uppsala, a shrewd and energetic man who had roused the nobles of the realm to action. [Bishop Oxenstierna appears to have been on the Danish side of what amounted to the civil war of the Kalmar union. His pro-Danish 1457 revolt was overthrown again by Karl Knutsson Bonde in 1464] Driven from the kingdom he [Bonde] is spending his exile on a small island not far from the mouth of the Vistula [is this somewhere near Danzig then...?] Christian [The Danish King], a man superior to him in piety and justice [i.e. friendlier to the nobles and the Church], was chosen in his place and in our time has once again combined the three kingdoms into one. Gotland, too, which was once the abode and homeland of the Goths, is subject to his rule [the piracy out of Gotland continued on and off for the rest of the 15th Century].
Posts: 2010
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 5:30 pm

Return to RPGs, History and Martial Arts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest